MHz UTC ITU Program + Location Details Remarks km 89.70 1514 MLT 89.7 BAY, Gharghur/Fidiel Zarb Street (mt) 1847km 89.40 1529 I Radio Kiss Kiss, Omignano/Monte Stella (sa) PI logged: 5225 1439km 89.60 1531 I Primaradio (Napoli), Caserta/Frazione Casertavecchia (ce) PI logged: 20FE PS logged: eliIMARAD 1327km 89.60 1532 I Radio Deejay, Castellammare di Stabia/Monte Faito-Via Cresta (na) PI logged: 5214 PS logged: DEEJAY 1372km
MHz Block UTC ITU Ensemble + Location Details Remarks km
178.35 5C 0546 D DR Deutschland, Dequede (san) Signal 0.666 520km 178.35 5C 0546 D DR Deutschland, Fulda/Hummelskopf (hes) Signal 0.222 351km 178.35 5C 0638 D DR Deutschland, Nürnberg-Schweinau (bay) Signal 0.506 482km 178.35 5C 0638 D DR Deutschland, Züssow (mev) Signal: 0.219 687km 190.64 7B 0708 D hr Radio, Großer Feldberg (Taunus)/hr (hes) 277km 190.64 7B 0709 D hr Radio, Kreuzberg (Rhön) (bay) 377km 178.35 5C 0750 D DR Deutschland, Schwerin (mev) Signal 0.348 541km 178.35 5C 0805 D DR Deutschland, Schöppingen (nrw) 215km new? TII 2112.
The other day I bought a Low Noise Amplifier from Amazon UK. The device is designed by RTL-SDR.com. Inspired by Nils Schiffhauer’s review of Qirx 3.1.2 Beta (part 1 and part 2) it was time to check out the RTL-SDR + LNA + Qirx 3.1.2 Beta combo. Data was always gathered in the same time span and with the same antennas.
Reception conditions were flat during these observations, no lift at all. ‘Without LNA’ doesn’t mean switched off but physically disconnected.
With nesdrSMArtee the same results are obtained. However the BIAS TEE cannot be switched off when using nesdrSMArtee!
SNR (db) readings in Qirx are virtually equal when using a LNA or not. There’s certainly no deterioration in signal quality when using this LNA.
With the LNA hooked up to the RTL-SDR Qirx’s AGC does a great job and the Gain (db) drops considerably. You can switch off the AGC and go for manual Gain settings, but there’s no need to do so: Qirx’s AGC works just fine.
The LNA performs very well when considering Strength in Qirx. Strength is represented on a scale from 0 to 1. Nearby strong transmitters at my QTH like Veltem, Liège or Wavre are of the same ‘Strength’ with or without the LNA. However more distant transmitters showing up in the TII are a different matter and spectacular improvements can be seen.
Measuring the ‘Magnitude‘ also clearly shows the impact of the LNA.
Conclusion
Do you need this LNA next to your RTL-SDR when doing some serious DAB listening? It all starts with a good rotatable antenna with a clear view and positioned as high as possible and not too long a coax lead. That’s of course almost impossible, so one needs to find a satisfying compromise. When there’s no lift or ‘conditions’ at my QTH there’s not much of a difference when using a LNA. No muxes are found which could not be heard under normal conditions, although signal strength has definitely and considerably improved.
What will happen when there’s a great opening like e.g. on December 29 2019? We’ll have to wait and see…
To be continued.
Update April 17 2021.
A quick indoors test: a laptop with a short whip. QIRX and RTL-SDR with or without LNA. Without the LNA 4 muxes can be received. With the LNA 5 are captured. The test was done several times and always the same results were obtained.
As mentioned in the previous post QT is a great tool to explore the world of DAB. It works well with RSP1A and AirspyR2. However R8220T dongles are not that great with QT. As can be seen in the video below this text there is indeed a big difference in performance between R820T and RSP1A. The antennas used were the same in both cases.